Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.


05:40 PM
Connect Directly

Intel Confirms Unauthorized Access of Earnings-Related Data

News likely contributed to slide of over 9% in chipmaker's stock at one point Friday.

Intel shares on Friday at one point dropped by as much as 9% from Thursday evening's close at least partly because of reports the chipmaker was forced to release its Q4, 2020 results a little early because someone illegally accessed earnings-related data from the company.

The Financial Times Thursday quoted Intel CFO George Davis as saying an individual had accessed material pertaining to Intel's financial results from the chipmaker's corporate website before the company's scheduled earnings announcement.

Related Content:

Intel Doubles Down on Emerging Technologies for Sharing and Using Data Securely

Special Report: Understanding Your Cyber Attackers

New From The Edge: How Cybersecurity Newbs Can Start Out on the Right Foot

Specifically, the individual accessed an infographic containing information on the results from a staging area on Intel's PR newsroom site. Upon discovering the illegal access, Intel decided to release its Q4 earnings about six minutes ahead of schedule, the FT reported Davis as saying.

Davis did not offer any further details on how the alleged intruder might have gained access to the infographic on Intel's PR website or whether other information had been illegally accessed as well.

In an emailed statement to Dark Reading, an Intel spokesperson confirmed the incident but said the breach did not result from a network compromise.

"Yesterday, the URL of our earnings infographic was inadvertently made publicly accessible before publication of our earnings and accessed by third parties," the statement said. "Once we became aware of the situation we promptly issued our earnings announcement. Intel's network was not compromised and we have adjusted our process to prevent this in the future."

News of the incident is believed to have at least partially contributed to Intel's stock slide Friday after the company announced what was regarded as a better-than-expected performance in the last quarter of 2020. Even though Intel's Q4 revenues of $20 billion was slight lower than during the same period in 2019, it still beat Wall Street expectations as did the company's net income for the quarter.

"The negative impact on Intel's finances after a hacker gained early access to earnings information from its website is, unfortunately, a sign of why data security has become a boardroom issue," said Max Vetter, chief cyber officer at Immersive Labs, in a statement. "This is a prime example of an attack that affects the entire organization."

The unauthorized access of earnings-related data at Intel is another example of how even large, security- and technology-savvy companies can become victims of breaches and security slip-ups just as easily as smaller organizations. Just last month, for instance, Microsoft disclosed its own network had been infected with malware-laden software updates from SolarWinds even as the company was investigating the breach on behalf of its customers. And security vendor FireEye in December disclosed that attackers had stolen some of its red team tools following an intrusion into its network that came via the malicious SolarWinds update.

"The incident at Intel just adds to the evidence that no organization on earth, public or private, is immune to material harm from breaches," says Hitesh Sheth, president and CEO at Vectra. "We know cybersecurity is a first priority at Intel, so imagine the vulnerabilities at organizations that are less vigilant."


Jai Vijayan is a seasoned technology reporter with over 20 years of experience in IT trade journalism. He was most recently a Senior Editor at Computerworld, where he covered information security and data privacy issues for the publication. Over the course of his 20-year ... View Full Bio

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Cyberattacks Are Tailored to Employees ... Why Isn't Security Training?
Tim Sadler, CEO and co-founder of Tessian,  6/17/2021
7 Powerful Cybersecurity Skills the Energy Sector Needs Most
Pam Baker, Contributing Writer,  6/22/2021
Microsoft Disrupts Large-Scale BEC Campaign Across Web Services
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  6/15/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
The State of Cybersecurity Incident Response
In this report learn how enterprises are building their incident response teams and processes, how they research potential compromises, how they respond to new breaches, and what tools and processes they use to remediate problems and improve their cyber defenses for the future.
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
Recent breaches of third-party apps are driving many organizations to think harder about the security of their off-the-shelf software as they continue to move left in secure software development practices.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-22
Trusty TLK contains a vulnerability in the NVIDIA TLK kernel function where a lack of checks allows the exploitation of an integer overflow on the size parameter of the tz_map_shared_mem function.
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-22
Trusty TLK contains a vulnerability in the NVIDIA TLK kernel�s tz_handle_trusted_app_smc function where a lack of integer overflow checks on the req_off and param_ofs variables leads to memory corruption of critical kernel structures.
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-22
Trusty TLK contains a vulnerability in the NVIDIA TLK kernel where an integer overflow in the tz_map_shared_mem function can bypass boundary checks, which might lead to denial of service.
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-22
Trusty contains a vulnerability in TSEC TA which deserializes the incoming messages even though the TSEC TA does not expose any command. This vulnerability might allow an attacker to exploit the deserializer to impact code execution, causing information disclosure.
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-22
Trusty contains a vulnerability in all TAs whose deserializer does not reject messages with multiple occurrences of the same parameter. The deserialization of untrusted data might allow an attacker to exploit the deserializer to impact code execution.