Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Endpoint

11/29/2018
10:30 AM
Eyal Benishti
Eyal Benishti
Commentary
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail vvv
50%
50%

The Return of Email Flooding

An old attack technique is making its way back into the mainstream with an onslaught of messages that legacy tools and script writing can't easily detect.

Imagine your inbox receiving 15,000 messages over the course of just a few days. What would certainly be an extreme nuisance could also translate into a huge productivity and operations liability, taking days or even weeks to return your primary method of communications back to normal.

Known as email flooding, this easy-to-implement technique is re-emerging among attackers for two primary reasons: to deliver the messages and demands of hacktivists, and as a diversionary tactic to help perpetrate financial or operational fraud.

A Tsunami of Emails
Also known as subscription bombing or email bombing, email flooding dates back to the late-1990s, when attackers automated programs to scan the web for sign-up forms and insert the emails of those being targeted into numerous subscription forms. The targeted emails would subsequently be sent to thousands of emails in a short period of time, often disabling the account.

Such attacks have been used in the past for harassment or for political purposes. One of the first noted instances was in 1996, when a stockbroker in San Francisco was bombarded with a flood of 25,000 emails that prevented him from using his computer.

Symantec argues that such attacks are almost impossible to prevent because they come from legitimate email accounts, and most major mail servers don't even pick them up in spam filters. The attacks can also be carried out automatically with simple scripts at registration forms that aren't protected by CAPTCHA or opt-in email. Today, sophisticated landing pages are built to continuously send automated messages to any valid email address.

A Smokescreen for Fraudulent Transactions
Email bombs are also still used as a means of harassment. In August 2017, an email bomb shut down ProPublica's email for a day, and secure email provider Tutanota was recently hit with a massive bomb that sent 500,000 newsletters to one of its mailboxes. At best, these attacks are a nuisance. But at their worst, they can cripple networks, shutter operations, and lead to a loss of productivity and revenue. 

In addition to hacktivism, email flooding is now being used as a smokescreen for more dangerous phishing techniques such as business email compromise, spearphishing and malware. Criminals use the email flood to distract victims and to exhaust security resources while they perpetrate fraudulent transactions. By the time the targeted person or organization clears the clutter and discovers the legitimate emails notifying them of account changes or suspicious activity, the attackers have made off with the funds.

The end-of-year global security report by AppRiver noted that cybercriminals are increasingly using this so-called "distributed spam distraction" (or DSD) to disguise fraud in real time. The attacks include email subscriptions and text-only messages that bombard the account for a period of 12 to 24 hours, then abruptly end after the real crime has been completed. Email bombs are not only effective but cheap and simple to orchestrate. Services on the Dark Web now enable anyone to bomb an email account with 5,000 messages for as little as $20.

The Underlying Need: A Comprehensive Email Strategy
With all types of phishing attacks increasing in frequency and sophistication, many organizations are hardening their email security posture at both the server and the mailbox. This is especially important to stop email flooding, as traditional email safeguards such as secure email gateways and phishing awareness training are not built to mitigate this technique.

Currently, organizations trying to remediate an email flooding attack are asking IT to create scripts and tools to counter the influx of emails that come in bulk or intermittently. While correct in theory, this approach is time consuming and there is no guarantee that it will work. A paper at the Anti-Phishing Working Group noted that one of the most effective measures against email flooding is a layered approach toward detection and throttling through volume and time-based methodologies with phrasal pattern recognition. Authors of the paper said a combination of user email behavior profiling and anomaly detection can better help identify the start of a bombing attack.

This early detection can enable users to maintain functionality of the inbox by limiting new messages and allowing expected messages to come through. In many cases, it may buy just enough time to enable the user or the security operations center team to prevent a wire transfer.

Hactivists and fraudsters may have very different motivations for launching email flooding attacks, but the outcomes for those on the receiving end are all damaging to finances, reputation, and operations, or a combination thereof. As this old technique makes its way back into the mainstream, those in charge of email security must adopt layered defenses that can detect and respond to an onslaught of messages with the efficiency that legacy tools and script writing cannot. 

Related Content:

 

Black Hat Europe returns to London Dec. 3-6, 2018, with hands-on technical Trainings, cutting-edge Briefings, Arsenal open-source tool demonstrations, top-tier security solutions, and service providers in the Business Hall. Click for information on the conference and to register.

Eyal Benishti has spent more than a decade in the information security industry, with a focus on software R&D for startups and enterprises. Before establishing IRONSCALES, he served as security researcher and malware analyst at Radware, where he filed two patents in the ... View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
BigIng123
50%
50%
BigIng123,
User Rank: Apprentice
10/19/2020 | 4:26:30 PM
Long-lasting disease
It doesn't really matter how old is that disease, it seems to never end. Anyway, there's a kind of way out for that https://utopia.fans/security/email-bomb-how-to-hide-from-attack/ Following these rules, you'll lower the risk of getting to email bombing. But I also believe it depends on the email provider you use.
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
11/29/2018 | 1:20:34 PM
motivations
Hactivists and fraudsters may have very different motivations for launching email flooding attacks, but the outcomes for those on the receiving end are all damaging to finances, reputation, and operations, or a combination thereof. Or just for the fun of it. They do it because nothing else better to do.
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
11/29/2018 | 1:19:13 PM
Cost
With all types of phishing attacks increasing in frequency and sophistication, many organizations are hardening their email security posture at both the server and the mailbox. This will certainly increase TCO, maybe best to go with third party systems such as g-suite or O365.
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
11/29/2018 | 1:17:38 PM
Business
In addition to hacktivism, email flooding is now being used as a smokescreen for more dangerous phishing techniques such as business email compromise, spearphishing and malware. I guess they are mainly after business emails so they can do physhing attack to business network.
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
11/29/2018 | 1:16:09 PM
legitimate
Symantec argues that such attacks are almost impossible to prevent because they come from legitimate email accounts, and most major mail servers don't even pick them up in spam filters. The attacks can also be carried out We should be able to indentify if a legitimate email doing illegitimate things.
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
11/29/2018 | 1:14:19 PM
Email flooding
Imagine your inbox receiving 15,000 messages over the course of just a few days This happens to me even when I just returned from 2-weeks vacation.
Manchester United Suffers Cyberattack
Dark Reading Staff 11/23/2020
As 'Anywhere Work' Evolves, Security Will Be Key Challenge
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  11/23/2020
Cloud Security Startup Lightspin Emerges From Stealth
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  11/24/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win an Amazon Gift Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-29378
PUBLISHED: 2020-11-29
An issue was discovered on V-SOL V1600D V2.03.69 and V2.03.57, V1600D4L V1.01.49, V1600D-MINI V1.01.48, V1600G1 V2.0.7 and V1.9.7, and V1600G2 V1.1.4 OLT devices. It is possible to elevate the privilege of a CLI user (to full administrative access) by using the password [email protected]#y$z%x6x7q8c9z) for the e...
CVE-2020-29379
PUBLISHED: 2020-11-29
An issue was discovered on V-SOL V1600D4L V1.01.49 and V1600D-MINI V1.01.48 OLT devices. During the process of updating the firmware, the update script starts a telnetd -l /bin/sh process that does not require authentication for TELNET access.
CVE-2020-29380
PUBLISHED: 2020-11-29
An issue was discovered on V-SOL V1600D V2.03.69 and V2.03.57, V1600D4L V1.01.49, V1600D-MINI V1.01.48, V1600G1 V2.0.7 and V1.9.7, and V1600G2 V1.1.4 OLT devices. TELNET is offered by default but SSH is not always available. An attacker can intercept passwords sent in cleartext and conduct a man-in-...
CVE-2020-29381
PUBLISHED: 2020-11-29
An issue was discovered on V-SOL V1600D V2.03.69 and V2.03.57, V1600D4L V1.01.49, V1600D-MINI V1.01.48, V1600G1 V2.0.7 and V1.9.7, and V1600G2 V1.1.4 OLT devices. Command injection can occur in "upload tftp syslog" and "upload tftp configuration" in the CLI via a crafted filename...
CVE-2020-29382
PUBLISHED: 2020-11-29
An issue was discovered on V-SOL V1600D V2.03.69 and V2.03.57, V1600G1 V2.0.7 and V1.9.7, and V1600G2 V1.1.4 OLT devices. A hardcoded RSA private key (specific to V1600D, V1600G1, and V1600G2) is contained in the firmware images.