Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
The Flaw in Vulnerability Management: It's Time to Get Real
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
JimS980
50%
50%
JimS980,
User Rank: Author
8/16/2019 | 1:20:40 PM
Re: The real problems facing vulnerability management are...
Automation always has it's limits and challenges. Working across and breaking down the organizational silo's  is certainly a big part of the challenge. But failure to develop the conditional logic and overcome the langage barriers between organizations is not a good enough excuse for not moving forward. Certainly the degree of auto remediation is limited to those vulnerabilities that you can ascertain with certaintity and resolve effectively. We recently implemented at a large retailer and we were able to resolve almost 80% of the predefined health checks and vulnerabilities automatically. The remainder required some human intervention. This translated to a significant SLA improvement and huge savings in time and money. Will they ever get to 100% is unlikely or maintain 80% is hard to say, but they have already benefited and arguably will continue to do so to varying and justifiable degree's going forward. 
seven_stones
50%
50%
seven_stones,
User Rank: Apprentice
8/16/2019 | 11:14:47 AM
The real problems facing vulnerability management are...
This article centres mostly around faster remediation and advocates automating this (patch deployment), and cites this as the main problem facing TVM capabilities. Automatic remediation is an extraordinarily bad idea, almost as bad as mayo on chips (french fries). This is basic IT operations 101. It's. A. Terrible. Idea.

No - the 2 main problems:
  • Staff in infosec are unable to speak the same language as IT teams who will address the problem and sign-off on the change request. Mostly they lack an attack mindset. They're not in a position to empathise and effectively justify the change.
  • lets say the aforementioned problem is not a problem, even then the tools used for automation of vulnerability assessment are BAD. I mean really bad. The market is so poorly served by vendors who managed somehow to get their name in the Gartner Magic Quadrant.


COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 7/2/2020
Ripple20 Threatens Increasingly Connected Medical Devices
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  6/30/2020
DDoS Attacks Jump 542% from Q4 2019 to Q1 2020
Dark Reading Staff 6/30/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
How Cybersecurity Incident Response Programs Work (and Why Some Don't)
This Tech Digest takes a look at the vital role cybersecurity incident response (IR) plays in managing cyber-risk within organizations. Download the Tech Digest today to find out how well-planned IR programs can detect intrusions, contain breaches, and help an organization restore normal operations.
Flash Poll
The Threat from the Internetand What Your Organization Can Do About It
The Threat from the Internetand What Your Organization Can Do About It
This report describes some of the latest attacks and threats emanating from the Internet, as well as advice and tips on how your organization can mitigate those threats before they affect your business. Download it today!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-9498
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-02
Apache Guacamole 1.1.0 and older may mishandle pointers involved inprocessing data received via RDP static virtual channels. If a userconnects to a malicious or compromised RDP server, a series ofspecially-crafted PDUs could result in memory corruption, possiblyallowing arbitrary code to be executed...
CVE-2020-3282
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-02
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Unified Communications Manager, Cisco Unified Communications Manager Session Management Edition, Cisco Unified Communications Manager IM & Presence Service, and Cisco Unity Connection could allow an unauthenticated, remote attack...
CVE-2020-5909
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-02
In versions 3.0.0-3.5.0, 2.0.0-2.9.0, and 1.0.1, when users run the command displayed in NGINX Controller user interface (UI) to fetch the agent installer, the server TLS certificate is not verified.
CVE-2020-5910
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-02
In versions 3.0.0-3.5.0, 2.0.0-2.9.0, and 1.0.1, the Neural Autonomic Transport System (NATS) messaging services in use by the NGINX Controller do not require any form of authentication, so any successful connection would be authorized.
CVE-2020-5911
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-02
In versions 3.0.0-3.5.0, 2.0.0-2.9.0, and 1.0.1, the NGINX Controller installer starts the download of Kubernetes packages from an HTTP URL On Debian/Ubuntu system.