Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
The Flaw in Vulnerability Management: It's Time to Get Real
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
JimS980
50%
50%
JimS980,
User Rank: Author
8/16/2019 | 1:20:40 PM
Re: The real problems facing vulnerability management are...
Automation always has it's limits and challenges. Working across and breaking down the organizational silo's  is certainly a big part of the challenge. But failure to develop the conditional logic and overcome the langage barriers between organizations is not a good enough excuse for not moving forward. Certainly the degree of auto remediation is limited to those vulnerabilities that you can ascertain with certaintity and resolve effectively. We recently implemented at a large retailer and we were able to resolve almost 80% of the predefined health checks and vulnerabilities automatically. The remainder required some human intervention. This translated to a significant SLA improvement and huge savings in time and money. Will they ever get to 100% is unlikely or maintain 80% is hard to say, but they have already benefited and arguably will continue to do so to varying and justifiable degree's going forward. 
seven_stones
50%
50%
seven_stones,
User Rank: Apprentice
8/16/2019 | 11:14:47 AM
The real problems facing vulnerability management are...
This article centres mostly around faster remediation and advocates automating this (patch deployment), and cites this as the main problem facing TVM capabilities. Automatic remediation is an extraordinarily bad idea, almost as bad as mayo on chips (french fries). This is basic IT operations 101. It's. A. Terrible. Idea.

No - the 2 main problems:
  • Staff in infosec are unable to speak the same language as IT teams who will address the problem and sign-off on the change request. Mostly they lack an attack mindset. They're not in a position to empathise and effectively justify the change.
  • lets say the aforementioned problem is not a problem, even then the tools used for automation of vulnerability assessment are BAD. I mean really bad. The market is so poorly served by vendors who managed somehow to get their name in the Gartner Magic Quadrant.


Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
6 Emerging Cyber Threats That Enterprises Face in 2020
This Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at six emerging cyber threats that enterprises could face in 2020. Download your copy today!
Flash Poll
State of Cybersecurity Incident Response
State of Cybersecurity Incident Response
Data breaches and regulations have forced organizations to pay closer attention to the security incident response function. However, security leaders may be overestimating their ability to detect and respond to security incidents. Read this report to find out more.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-8423
PUBLISHED: 2020-04-02
A buffer overflow in the httpd daemon on TP-Link TL-WR841N V10 (firmware version 3.16.9) devices allows an authenticated remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via a GET request to the page for the configuration of the Wi-Fi network.
CVE-2019-14868
PUBLISHED: 2020-04-02
In ksh version 20120801, a flaw was found in the way it evaluates certain environment variables. An attacker could use this flaw to override or bypass environment restrictions to execute shell commands. Services and applications that allow remote unauthenticated attackers to provide one of those env...
CVE-2019-20635
PUBLISHED: 2020-04-02
codeBeamer before 9.5.0-RC3 does not properly restrict the ability to execute custom Java code and access the Java class loader via computed fields.
CVE-2020-11452
PUBLISHED: 2020-04-02
Microstrategy Web 10.4 includes functionality to allow users to import files or data from external resources such as URLs or databases. By providing an external URL under attacker control, it's possible to send requests to external resources (aka SSRF) or leak files from the local system using the f...
CVE-2020-11453
PUBLISHED: 2020-04-02
Microstrategy Web 10.4 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in the Test Web Service functionality exposed through the path /MicroStrategyWS/. The functionality requires no authentication and, while it is not possible to pass parameters in the SSRF request, it is still possible to exploit it ...