Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
California Man Arrested for Politically Motivated DDoS
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
boholuxe
50%
50%
boholuxe,
User Rank: Apprentice
2/27/2020 | 3:15:45 PM
one IP?
Attack from one IP is not DDOS attack. Such attacks should be easily blocked on server by a simple server configuration
RyanSepe
50%
50%
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
2/27/2020 | 1:59:19 PM
Re: DoS not DDoS
This article is a snippet of a more comprehensive article. But the point the original comment was trying to make was that if the attack came from a single system it would be DoS and not DDoS which they are correct based on the information that is provided.

Distributed refers to an attack from many separate systems. A many to one methodology, where DoS can still come from one system using a variety of methods but the term DDoS is constantly used as a misnomer for everything DoS related. And that's basically what the commentor was calling out.

I go into more detail in another response as to my position on the attack, maybe trying to have the article save face but without reviewing the details extensively and just looking at what is provided they are definitely correct in their assessment.

And welcome to Cyber Security. It's an interesting field.
RyanSepe
50%
50%
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
2/27/2020 | 1:54:58 PM
Re: DoS not DDoS
It could have originated from a single AWS server but most likely this server leveraged a zombie network to distribute the attack. I would have to dive further into the logisitics but it seems implausible that a single server would be effective at a DoS attack even using a very effective method like reflective DNS for 4 separate campaigns.

That's just my guess. I would have to see if that level of detail has been revealed.

But I definitely understand your point.
Red444
50%
50%
Red444,
User Rank: Apprentice
2/26/2020 | 11:19:54 AM
Re: DoS not DDoS
I'm sorry, but why? 

I'm still learning cyber security... 
CyberInstructor
50%
50%
CyberInstructor,
User Rank: Strategist
2/24/2020 | 10:23:07 AM
"Here's your stupid sign!"
Comment for the older generation folks:  this is definitely a case of "here's your stupid sign."  
Marc Kranat
100%
0%
Marc Kranat,
User Rank: Apprentice
2/23/2020 | 8:58:45 PM
DoS not DDoS
It's not distributed, the original article said the attack all originated from one server, so a DoS attack.

Why they would have so much trouble and it took so much time blocking an attack from a single IP is a bit of a surprise.


COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 5/22/2020
How an Industry Consortium Can Reinvent Security Solution Testing
Henry Harrison, Co-founder & Chief Technology Officer, Garrison,  5/21/2020
Is Zero Trust the Best Answer to the COVID-19 Lockdown?
Dan Blum, Cybersecurity & Risk Management Strategist,  5/20/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
How Cybersecurity Incident Response Programs Work (and Why Some Don't)
This Tech Digest takes a look at the vital role cybersecurity incident response (IR) plays in managing cyber-risk within organizations. Download the Tech Digest today to find out how well-planned IR programs can detect intrusions, contain breaches, and help an organization restore normal operations.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-10737
PUBLISHED: 2020-05-27
A race condition was found in the mkhomedir tool shipped with the oddjob package in versions before 0.34.5 and 0.34.6 wherein, during the home creation, mkhomedir copies the /etc/skel directory into the newly created home and changes its ownership to the home's user without properly checking the hom...
CVE-2020-13622
PUBLISHED: 2020-05-27
JerryScript 2.2.0 allows attackers to cause a denial of service (assertion failure) because a property key query for a Proxy object returns unintended data.
CVE-2020-13623
PUBLISHED: 2020-05-27
JerryScript 2.2.0 allows attackers to cause a denial of service (stack consumption) via a proxy operation.
CVE-2020-13616
PUBLISHED: 2020-05-26
The boost ASIO wrapper in net/asio.cpp in Pichi before 1.3.0 lacks TLS hostname verification.
CVE-2020-13614
PUBLISHED: 2020-05-26
An issue was discovered in ssl.c in Axel before 2.17.8. The TLS implementation lacks hostname verification.