Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

8/27/2019
11:00 AM
Dark Reading
Dark Reading
Products and Releases
50%
50%

Shared Assessments Brings New Module to Third Party Risk Management Framework

SANTA FE, N.M.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--The Shared Assessments Program, the member-driven leader in third party risk assurance, today announced an important new addition to its Third Party Risk Management (TPRM) Framework covering the subjects of periodic assessments and continuous monitoring. Periodic assessments and continuous monitoring lie at the heart of the “Trust, but Verify” model, uniformly recognized as the gold standard for vendor assessments. This new Framework module is available today to program members on the Shared Assessments web site (www.sharedassessments.org).

Topics explored include: Organizations globally are searching for ways to improve the efficiency of existing third party risk management programs while simultaneously enhancing effectiveness, and this module examines a number of emerging processes that can help meet those twin goals.

  • Virtual and Open House Assessments
  • Brokered Assessment Repositories
  • Assurance Portals
  • Collaborative Assessments
  • Assessment Load Leveling

The module explores the changing relationship between periodic assessments and continuous monitoring, and examines solutions to the problems organizations are reporting when implementing continuous monitoring programs focused on threat intelligence. It’s a “nuts and bolts” guide whether improving existing programs or planning TPRM processes from scratch.

Pre-release readers have been enthusiastic in their praise. “This is a great blueprint for anyone that is either building a TPRM program or someone that’s looking to assess if their existing TPRM program encompasses all the current thought leadership in third party risk,” said Paul Poh, Managing Partner, Radical Security.

“The guidance in this release is spot-on, especially given the evolving threat landscape and the reliance on third party service and hosting providers,” said Rocco Grillo, Managing Director Global Cyber Risk Service, Alverez & Marsal. He continued, “With the module’s focus on integrating continuous monitoring and incident management processes into legacy TPRM programs, it will propel organizations in their quest to achieve greater cybersecurity resiliency. The module provides solid guidance to mitigate the everyday issues and risks that imperil program efficacy.”

Commenting on the module’s depth in exploring periodic assessments and continuous monitoring, Pete Tannish, Director of Information Security, Small Business Financial Exchange (SBFE LLC), said, “This document is by far the most thorough I’ve ever seen. [It] gives the reader any and every option of what to consider in order to build a program based on cost and/or risk.”

To download a copy of the Shared Assessments TPRM Framework, go to https://sharedassessments.org/framework/.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Threaded  |  Newest First  |  Oldest First
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
6 Emerging Cyber Threats That Enterprises Face in 2020
This Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at six emerging cyber threats that enterprises could face in 2020. Download your copy today!
Flash Poll
State of Cybersecurity Incident Response
State of Cybersecurity Incident Response
Data breaches and regulations have forced organizations to pay closer attention to the security incident response function. However, security leaders may be overestimating their ability to detect and respond to security incidents. Read this report to find out more.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-11458
PUBLISHED: 2020-04-02
app/Model/feed.php in MISP before 2.4.124 allows administrators to choose arbitrary files that should be ingested by MISP. This does not cause a leak of the full contents of a file, but does cause a leaks of strings that match certain patterns. Among the data that can leak are passwords from databas...
CVE-2020-8015
PUBLISHED: 2020-04-02
A UNIX Symbolic Link (Symlink) Following vulnerability in the packaging of exim in openSUSE Factory allows local attackers to escalate from user mail to root. This issue affects: openSUSE Factory exim versions prior to 4.93.0.4-3.1.
CVE-2020-1927
PUBLISHED: 2020-04-02
In Apache HTTP Server 2.4.0 to 2.4.41, redirects configured with mod_rewrite that were intended to be self-referential might be fooled by encoded newlines and redirect instead to an an unexpected URL within the request URL.
CVE-2020-8144
PUBLISHED: 2020-04-01
The UniFi Video Server v3.9.3 and prior (for Windows 7/8/10 x64) web interface Firmware Update functionality, under certain circumstances, does not validate firmware download destinations to ensure they are within the intended destination directory tree. It accepts a request with a URL to firmware u...
CVE-2020-8145
PUBLISHED: 2020-04-01
The UniFi Video Server (Windows) web interface configuration restore functionality at the “backup� and “wizard� endpoints does not implement sufficient privilege checks. Low privileged users, belonging to the PUBLIC_GROUP ...